Kolors实测反馈

1. 语义理解（Kolors VS DALL-E 3）
   Kolors支持中文提示词，对于英语基础薄弱的用户来说十分友好。经过多张图的实测，可以看出Kolors的语义理解能力可以比肩DALL-E 3。
2. 美学风格（Kolors VS Midjourney）
   使用相同提示词（除中英文翻译有偏差外）对比Midjourney与Kolors的效果，可以明显看出Midjourney的美学风格更为接近预期，甚至部分图像质量更高。不过，美学风格见仁见智，个人主观感觉Kolors与Midjourney几乎无异。
3. 缺点

• 使用门槛
  相较于Midjourney，Kolors的使用体验没有那么直观，无法即开即用。如果是ComfyUI用户，上手难度会降低一些，只需按需下载模型即可使用。
• 商用
  快手没有直接授权Kolors的商业使用权，需提交商用申请并通过邮件详细说明模型的用途。

Kolors Test Feedback

1. Semantic Understanding (Kolors VS DALL-E 3)

Kolors supports Chinese prompts, making it very user-friendly for those with a weak foundation in English. After testing multiple images, it is evident that Kolors' semantic understanding ability can rival that of DALL-E

1. Aesthetic Style (Kolors VS Midjourney)

By using the same prompts (aside from minor discrepancies in translation between Chinese and English) to compare Midjourney and Kolors, it is clear that Midjourney's aesthetic style more closely aligns with expectations and even produces higher-quality images in some cases. However, aesthetics are subjective, and personally, I find Kolors and Midjourney almost indistinguishable.

1. Drawbacks

• Usability Barrier

Compared to Midjourney, Kolors is not as intuitive and cannot be used immediately out of the box. For ComfyUI users, the learning curve is less steep, requiring only the necessary model downloads to start using.

• Commercial Use

Kwai does not directly authorize the commercial use of Kolors. Users must submit a commercial application and provide detailed information about the model's intended use via email.