Flux controlnet comparison
5.0
0 reviewsDescription
While comparing the different controlnets I noticed that most retained good details around 0.6 strength and started to quickly drop in quality as I increased the strength to 0.7 and higher. The InstantX union pro model stands out however only the depth preconditioning seemed to give consistently good images while canny was decent and openpose was fairly bad.
For only being a bit over 1 month since Flux release were incredibly lucky to have the controlnets we do however we are still a long ways off the detailed control over image generation we have with Xinsirs SDXL controlnets.
UPDATE: new controlnets have come out since making this workflow and should be made when assessing best Flux controlnet
Discussion
(No comments yet)
Loading...
Reviews
No reviews yet
Versions (1)
- latest (a year ago)
Node Details
Primitive Nodes (49)
ApplyFluxControlNet (3)
ApplyTheMistoFluxControlNet (1)
CLIPTextEncodeFlux (1)
ControlNetApplySD3 (4)
DepthAnything_V2 (1)
DownloadAndLoadDepthAnythingV2Model (1)
FluxGuidance (5)
Image Comparer (rgthree) (9)
KSamplerTheMisto (1)
LoadFluxControlNet (3)
LoadTheMistoFluxControlNet (1)
Note (1)
PrimitiveNode (2)
Reroute (8)
Seed (rgthree) (1)
SetUnionControlNetType (4)
XlabsSampler (3)
Custom Nodes (36)
- AnyLinePreprocessor (1)
ComfyUI
- DualCLIPLoader (1)
- VAELoader (1)
- UNETLoader (1)
- ConditioningZeroOut (1)
- KSampler (5)
- ControlNetLoader (4)
- PreviewImage (6)
- EmptyLatentImage (1)
- VAEDecode (8)
- LoadImage (1)
- ImageScale (1)
- ComfyUIDeployExternalText (1)
- ImpactMakeImageBatch (1)
- CannyEdgePreprocessor (1)
- OpenposePreprocessor (1)
- HEDPreprocessor (1)
Model Details
Checkpoints (0)
LoRAs (0)