My stuff

  • My Workflows

  • Liked Workflows

  • Following Workflows

Go to OpenArt main site
Upload workflow

Flux controlnet comparison

5.0

0 reviews
20
16.3K
2.9K
6
Description







While comparing the different controlnets I noticed that most retained good details around 0.6 strength and started to quickly drop in quality as I increased the strength to 0.7 and higher. The InstantX union pro model stands out however only the depth preconditioning seemed to give consistently good images while canny was decent and openpose was fairly bad.


For only being a bit over 1 month since Flux release were incredibly lucky to have the controlnets we do however we are still a long ways off the detailed control over image generation we have with Xinsirs SDXL controlnets.


UPDATE: new controlnets have come out since making this workflow and should be made when assessing best Flux controlnet

Discussion

(No comments yet)

Loading...

Author

1
2.9K
20
16.2K

No reviews yet

  • - latest (a year ago)

Primitive Nodes (49)

ApplyFluxControlNet (3)

ApplyTheMistoFluxControlNet (1)

CLIPTextEncodeFlux (1)

ControlNetApplySD3 (4)

DepthAnything_V2 (1)

DownloadAndLoadDepthAnythingV2Model (1)

FluxGuidance (5)

Image Comparer (rgthree) (9)

KSamplerTheMisto (1)

LoadFluxControlNet (3)

LoadTheMistoFluxControlNet (1)

Note (1)

PrimitiveNode (2)

Reroute (8)

Seed (rgthree) (1)

SetUnionControlNetType (4)

XlabsSampler (3)

Custom Nodes (36)

Anyline

  • - AnyLinePreprocessor (1)

ComfyUI

  • - DualCLIPLoader (1)

  • - VAELoader (1)

  • - UNETLoader (1)

  • - ConditioningZeroOut (1)

  • - KSampler (5)

  • - ControlNetLoader (4)

  • - PreviewImage (6)

  • - EmptyLatentImage (1)

  • - VAEDecode (8)

  • - LoadImage (1)

  • - ImageScale (1)

  • - ComfyUIDeployExternalText (1)

  • - ImpactMakeImageBatch (1)

  • - CannyEdgePreprocessor (1)

  • - OpenposePreprocessor (1)

  • - HEDPreprocessor (1)

Checkpoints (0)

LoRAs (0)